Strategic Structure Audit

For an existing cross-border structure that needs a system-level review before scaling, financing, restructuring or a sensitive banking or tax event. We map the current model, identify the material cross-border gaps and turn them into a prioritised implementation plan.

Flagship format · System level · Group · PE · VAT · Banking · CFC

When a system-level audit is useful

Use the strategic audit when separate local decisions have accumulated and no single view shows how ownership, management, PE and VAT interfaces, CFC, banking and regulatory dependencies interact. The output is a current-state map, risk priorities and an implementation sequence, with jurisdiction-specific specialist conclusions integrated where required.

Misalignment of functions

Documents and legal form do not match how the business actually operates: people, sales, management.

PE / VAT “suddenly”

An operational footprint in the EU/UK starts creating obligations where they were “not planned”.

Banks and explainability

There is no coherent logic for ownership and flows: the bank does not understand the economic rationale of the structure.

What the strategic audit includes

The content depends on the model, but the perimeter is always systemic: we review how the elements reinforce or break one another.

01 · GROUP

Group architecture

Functions, risks and assets by layer. HoldCo / OpCo / ServiceCo logic. Alignment with the actual operating model.

02 · PE / TEAM

PE risk and operational footprint

People, authority, negotiations, management and contracts. Where an actual “taxable footprint” arises.

03 · VAT

VAT and supply chains

OSS / IOSS, fixed establishment, marketplaces, warehouses and supply-chain logic, including through contractors.

04 · PERSONAL RISKS

Tax residency and CFC

Personal tax residency, control tests, CFC, dividend logic and the “spillover” of risks to the owner. Separately — treaty access (DTT), the withholding tax (WHT) position, beneficial ownership and the principal purpose test (PPT).

05 · BANKS

banking readiness

KYC logic, source of funds, explanation of ownership/flows and the “explainability” of the structure for onboarding and monitoring.

06 · REGULATOR

Regulatory alignment

Licensing perimeter, compatibility of the model with compliance requirements and with growth/investors.

How the audit works

No “hours of consultation for the sake of consultation”. We structure the work so that the output is a system map and an implementation plan.

01

Qualification and perimeter

Short session + structured intake: we record the objective, geography, current scheme and constraints. We confirm the scope.

02

Fact collection and mapping

Functions/risks/assets, the “people footprint”, supply chains and governance. We build the “as is” position — without idealisation.

03

Stress test and gaps

PE/VAT/CFC/banks/regulation. We identify points of misalignment and the domino effect: one error → several risks.

04

Model map and action plan

We deliver a structural map, prioritisation, target logic for “how it should be” and an implementation roadmap.

What you receive as output

  • Structural map of the model: links between blocks and risks
  • List of misalignments and prioritisation: quick improvements / systemic changes
  • Recommended architecture and logic for allocating functions/risks
  • Banking “explainability” package: logic and list of documents for KYC
  • Implementation plan and list of questions for local counsel

When a strategic audit is the
right format

Scaling

Entry into the EU/UK, team growth, new markets, new logistics.

Bank / payment providers

Onboarding, enhanced review, preparation for monitoring.

Investor / transaction

Review before a round, M&A, restructuring of ownership and IP.

The logic has “drifted apart”

Local decisions have accumulated — the system has become internally inconsistent.

Briefly, to the point

What is a Strategic Structure Audit?

It is a comprehensive analysis of the international model as a system: group structure, PE risk, VAT, personal tax residency, CFC, banking readiness, regulatory alignment and governance — within one perimeter, not as separate tasks. The audit shows how coherent, defensible and ready the model is for growth, review or a transaction.

Why does the audit cover all elements at once?

Because the elements of an international structure are connected: tax residency affects PE risk, which in turn affects VAT and banking clarity. A siloed analysis misses conflicts at the interfaces. A strategic audit brings everything into one perimeter to show where the model is aligned and where its parts contradict one another and create risk.

When is a strategic audit the appropriate work format?

An audit is appropriate when the model is complex or changing: several jurisdictions, team growth, preparation for a transaction, investor or bank, or entry into new markets. It is needed when the priority is not to close one question in isolation, but to make sure that the whole structure can withstand external review and remain robust as it develops further.

How does the audit work and what do I receive?

The audit proceeds as a sequential review of the model across all elements of the system, identifying risk zones and their interconnections. The output is a coherent picture of the structure, a vulnerability map, priorities and aligned logic in which tax, banking and regulatory components are assembled into one defensible model, ready for growth and review.

If the structure needs to be redesigned

When the audit shows that the model requires not a targeted correction but a new route, we design the structure strategy: jurisdiction roles, ownership, governance, banking and KYC logic. Registration and local actions are coordinated through local counsel and specialist professionals. We design the architecture — we do not replace the registrar.

Choose the work format by the stage of the task

For an investor, financing, sale or major structural change, the Strategic Structure Audit is often the natural starting point when the existing model must withstand external review. A defined remediation or restructuring mandate can move directly into a project.

Express Risk Review

Use only when the transaction perimeter is still unclear and a bounded triage is needed before committing to a wider mandate.

Open format →
Strategic Structure Audit

Use when the existing international structure must be reviewed as one system before investor due diligence, financing, sale or a major change.

Open format →
Project-Based Advisory

Use for defined pre-transaction restructuring, remediation, evidence preparation, due-diligence response or implementation of agreed changes.

Open format →
Ongoing Advisory

Use after the transaction only where continuing cross-border coordination, integration or monitoring has a defined recurring scope.

Open format →

If what is needed is not an answer to one question, but a coherent map of the model

Describe the current structure, geography, team and main question.
We will define the relevant scope and confirm whether a strategic audit is the appropriate work format for the task.

Request an Audit
Initial qualification · scope after review of the request · no guarantee of a specific outcome