Structuring Principles for International Structures
The allocation of functions, risks and profit must align with governance, control and substantive presence — as one coherent system.
Basic Group Architecture
An international structure is a governance architecture, not a set of legal entities.
The parent company is responsible for strategy, capital and control over key decisions. The operating company generates revenue and assumes commercial risk. Clients create the cash flow, which must move through the structure in a coherent way.
If functions, control and profit are not aligned, a structural imbalance arises.
Tax Logic
Profit should arise where the real functions, control and economic presence are located. Tax logic cannot be designed separately from the actual business model.
If profit is shifted to a place where there is no governance or presence, the structure becomes vulnerable. This applies both to international taxation and to banking review.
What is Reviewed
- whether profit corresponds to the group’s real functions;
- whether control and income allocation are aligned;
- whether the stated model has an economic basis;
- whether there is a gap between the structure and its explainability.
Permanent Establishment Risk
Even a correctly registered structure can create tax presence in another country if activity is actually carried out there, decisions are made there, or the team works there.
Permanent establishment risk arises from the reality of the business, not from the company’s name.
Banking Perspective
A bank assesses the logic of the structure, not the tax rate. It looks at how far activity, flows, ownership structure and governance are actually aligned with each other.
What the Bank Reviews
- whether the activity matches the stated model;
- the transparency and explainability of flows;
- the coherence of the ownership structure;
- the reality of governance and control.
Banking review often reveals architectural gaps before a tax authority or regulator does.
A robust international structure is alignment between function, risk, profit and governance.
In Brief
What principles should an international structure be built on?
The key principle is alignment: the allocation of functions, risks and profit must correspond to governance, control and economic presence. Tax logic, substantive presence, permanent establishment risk and banking clarity do not exist separately — they must be brought into one explainable model capable of withstanding external review.
Why must profit allocation match the functions?
If profit is concentrated where there are no real functions, people or decision-making, the model becomes vulnerable in tax and banking review. The principle requires economic logic to match the facts: where value is created and risks are borne, profit should be recognised; otherwise the structure is not defensible.
How are the principles connected to substantive presence?
Substantive presence is the reality test for the principles: where the people are, who makes decisions and where the functions are performed. Governance and control must align with the stated structure; otherwise permanent establishment risk and a tax residency dispute may arise. Presence confirms that the model does not exist only on paper.
How can the principles be translated into a specific structure?
The principles are translated into practice through the structural model and the risk map: the model shows how to assemble functions, assets and governance into a robust configuration, while the risk map shows where that configuration most often diverges from reality. Together, they turn general alignment rules into specific, verifiable decisions.
Need a review of the principles behind your structure?
We identify exactly where the model diverges from governance, substantive presence, risk allocation and banking logic.
Request a Structural Review