Fact and Context Collection
Business structure, jurisdictions, group composition, participants, flows, current issues and objective.
We step in where an international matter requires more than an answer on one country: where systematic work is needed at the intersection of structure, tax risks, banking readiness, VAT, people footprint and regulatory expectations.
International matters are rarely resolved through one consultation or one jurisdiction. The work therefore usually starts with diagnostics: where exactly the issue sits, what is not aligned in the current model, which risks have already arisen or may arise, and which participants, documents and jurisdictions must be brought into one workable picture.
We do not start with a ready-made answer. We start with the factual picture, structure, objectives and constraints — and only then form a reasoned position and a practical action plan.
The level of detail changes by matter, but the logic remains the same.
Business structure, jurisdictions, group composition, participants, flows, current issues and objective.
Where the misalignment arises: structure, residency, people model, VAT, banking/PSP, licensing, governance.
Options, constraints and dependencies. The logic must be aligned across the elements of the model.
Steps, priorities and participants. What is done, in what sequence, and which confirmations are needed.
Where needed: local counsel, banks/PSPs, VAT providers, payroll, compliance and internal project participants.
The quality of the work depends directly on the completeness of the initial information: the more accurate the input picture, the more accurate the resulting logic.
Briefly: what is happening, what needs to change, and what counts as “success” for the business.
Jurisdictions, companies, roles, ownership, governance and key flows.
Countries, key persons, team and engagement format (employee/contractor/EOR).
Current banks/providers, compliance questions and where the operational activity actually takes place.
The minimum dataset without which a workable picture cannot be assembled correctly.
The work ends not with a conversation, but with a structured result that can be used for the next steps.
A structured map of issues and risks across the key areas.
Working logic and reasoning on key issues.
Where alternatives exist, they are described with limitations and trade-offs.
Classification of risks by type and priority.
A list of confirmations and documents required for implementation.
Sequence of steps, participants and dependencies.
Request an initial review: it makes it possible to understand the structure of the matter, its scope and the appropriate work format.
Request a Review